Listening To The Room – Word, Open-Mic Voices And The Practice Of Attention

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Radio Lear is built around the idea that creative audio can do more than carry information. It can hold atmosphere, memory, presence and the small shifts of attention that happen when people gather, listen and speak. In this feature, recorded at a Word open-mic event at Attenborough Arts on Thursday 28th May 2026, we hear poetry not as a finished cultural product, but as a living social act.

This is not a full recording of the evening. It is an edited impression of the event, shaped from a sequence of voices, fragments and moments. The aim is to give a sense of the room: the red light on the stage, the microphones, the papers held in hand, the pauses before speaking, the warmth of the audience, and the way a loosely curated event allows different kinds of expression to find their own place.

Open-mic events have a particular energy. They are neither entirely formal nor entirely casual. There is a structure: a host, a stage, a running order, a microphone, and an audience waiting to listen. Yet, there is also uncertainty. Someone may be reading for the first time. Someone may bring work that has been carefully shaped over months. Someone else may arrive with a poem written only the day before. The room has to adjust to each voice as it comes forward.

That adjustment is part of the art of the evening. An open-mic room is not only made by the performers. It is made by the listeners as well. Their patience, laughter, stillness, encouragement and willingness to stay with uncertainty all shape the event. Culture is not simply being presented here. It is being practised.

For Radio Lear, this is an important distinction. Much of the value of spoken-word and community arts practice lies in the conditions that allow people to become audible. A poem in this setting is not only a text. It is a moment of presence. It is a person stepping into a shared space and asking others to listen for a few minutes.

The feature includes work that moves through emotional repair, memory, humour, disability access, faith, daydreaming, family, belonging and the return to creative confidence. Some of the voices are reflective and intimate. Others are comic, rhythmic or theatrical. What holds them together is not a single theme, but a shared format: the open-mic invitation, the temporary stage, and the willingness to risk speech in front of others.

Kamisha Hawkins brings a reflective and musical quality, moving through shame, fear, grief and self-acceptance towards tenderness and repair. Bavin, Gohel’s “Dear Rome” turns the imagination of travel into practical questions about access, lifts, toilets and the body. Jessica’s poems gather colour, family memory, waiting, movement and inherited stories into a personal map of where someone comes from.

Cat Hurst’s piece offers one of the clearest reflections on what poetry can do when it returns after a long absence. Poetry is remembered first as something that once felt like a test, something to be analysed until it stopped breathing. Then it comes back differently: less like an examination, more like an open door. That sense of return runs through the feature. Return to voice. Return to confidence. Return to imaginative attention.

Pearl’s contribution is more intimate, shaped around belonging, womanhood, family, faith and the search for a place to stand. Imane’s poem moves across different religious and spiritual spaces, less as doctrine than as felt experience. Lorna Al-Wain opens out into a chant-like reflection on daydreaming, treating the drifting imagination not as wasted time, but as a charged and potentially creative state. Thin Man brings a different register again, with comic exaggeration, absurdity and theatrical release.

This movement between tones is one of the strengths of a loosely curated event. It does not flatten the evening into a single mood. It allows seriousness and play to sit alongside one another. It allows a room to move from vulnerability to laughter, from prayer to absurdity, from memory to rhythm, from hesitation to performance.

There is a civic quality in this, although not in the formal language of institutions. It is civic in the everyday sense of people gathering, making room for one another, and accepting that public voice does not only belong to polished speakers or professional performers. It belongs also to those who are trying something out, returning to something lost, or finding the courage to speak for the first time.

Radio Lear exists for this kind of listening. It is a platform for voices, stories, soundscapes and creative encounters that might otherwise pass quickly through a room and disappear. Recording does not replace the live event, but it can leave a trace. It allows the atmosphere to travel. It allows a listener elsewhere to hear something of the timing, warmth and unpredictability of the room.

What stays with this recording is not only the content of individual poems. It is the sound of people stepping forward. The small intake of breath before a poem begins. The papers shifting. The audience responding. The moment when a voice finds its balance. The way humour changes the air. The way a room can hold someone’s uncertainty without rushing to tidy it up.

In that sense, this feature is not only about Word, or poetry, or one evening at Attenborough Arts. It is about the practice of attention. It is about what happens when people are given a modest platform, enough time, and a room willing to listen.

For Radio Lear, that is the value of sharing this recording. It offers a glimpse of culture being made in real time: informal, generous, imperfect, emotionally varied, and alive to the voices that emerge when a space is held open.