Distraction Therapy 048 – The Divided Challenge of Arts
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Elitism in the arts refers to the notion that certain art forms are of higher value and should be appreciated by those with the cultural knowledge and education to fully grasp their meaning. This view creates a distinction between “high art”—such as classical music, fine art, opera, and certain forms of literature—and “popular” or “mass” culture, which is often considered more accessible but of lesser intellectual or aesthetic value. Elitist art, often supported by institutions like galleries, symphony orchestras, and universities tends to emphasise tradition, complexity, and intellectual depth, positioning itself as a more serious, enduring form of cultural expression.
This divide becomes particularly evident in the way elitist art challenges the rise of mass-produced and disposable popular culture. Popular culture, driven by market forces, is typically designed for broad appeal and easy consumption. It is typically characterised by entertainment forms like television, popular music, and commercial cinema, which are meant to be enjoyed quickly and without much intellectual effort. Critics of popular culture argue that it is formulaic, shallow, and created with commercial profit in mind rather than artistic integrity.
An example of how elitist art counters this can be seen in the world of classical music compared to mainstream pop. A symphony by Beethoven or a modernist opera by Benjamin Britten demands careful attention, patience, and knowledge of musical structure and history. These works are celebrated not only for their beauty but also for the way they engage with complex themes—social, emotional, and philosophical—that go beyond mere entertainment. In contrast, much of today’s pop music, though catchy and widely popular, is often considered transient, designed for immediate gratification and quick obsolescence, reflecting the commercial pressures of the entertainment industry.
Elitist art is also regarded as timeless, resisting the ephemeral nature of mass culture. Classic works of literature, such as those by James Joyce or Virginia Woolf, are considered to require a greater level of engagement and intellectual work from the reader. They offer layers of meaning and deep exploration of the human condition, in contrast to many best-selling novels, which are written to be consumed rapidly, frequently offering straightforward plots and themes that do not require sustained reflection.
However, elitist art is not without its critics. Some argue that it can become disconnected from everyday life, appealing mainly to those who possess the cultural capital to appreciate its complexity. Yet, it is this very complexity and the demand it places on its audience that positions elitist art as a counter to the more disposable and commercialised aspects of popular culture. By requiring deeper reflection and understanding, it resists the superficiality and rapid turnover that characterise much of modern mass media.
At the heart of this tension is a debate about the value of art and its role in society. Elitist art, while critiqued for reinforcing social hierarchies, seeks to preserve a space for works that demand more from their audience—works that offer a lasting impact, in contrast to the fleeting nature of much popular culture. This dynamic between enduring, intellectually challenging art and more immediate, commercially driven cultural products continues to shape discussions about artistic value and inclusivity in the modern world.
